TIBCO and MuleSoft are both major players in the Integration Platform-as-a-Service (iPaaS) industry. However, their approaches differ significantly. Recently, TIBCO has had fewer notable feature releases for its cloud product.
On the other hand, MuleSoft continues to provide a comprehensive set of corporate tools for handling complex integration scenarios. MuleSoft also has the upper hand in terms of innovation and commitment to user experience.
Customers migrate from TIBCO to MuleSoft or other solutions for various reasons. These include waning popularity, limited API management, and architectural and licensing changes. Below, we will explore some of the reasons why customers are migrating from TIBCO to MuleSoft and other alternatives.
1. TIBCO at a Crossroads
Migration from legacy solutions like TIBCO to innovative platforms inevitably improves efficiency, reduces costs, and accelerates data transformation. TIBCO’s popularity has gradually decreased while alternative integration tools like MuleSoft are gathering momentum. Current TIBCO users are facing a proper challenge and a choice to make. They will need to select an alternative solution that increases their business agility and IT flexibility at a reasonable price.
Using the TIBCO platform for integrations could raise a few concerns. For example, if TIBCO customers use BusinessWorks 5.x, they will have to choose between upgrading to BusinessWorks 6.x and transitioning to TIBCO’s Cloud Integration (Scribe) platform. And if they decide to go with TIBCO’s Cloud Integration (Scribe), they will still need to compare it to other cloud-native platforms. And they will inevitably recognize that the comparison between platforms does not flatter TIBCO.
2. Updated Licensing Costs
TIBCO’s updated licensing strategy will hit perpetual license holders harder. This will be most evident with larger customers as TIBCO plans to discontinue product support for such licenses. The end of perpetual licenses will mean current license holders will use older code with updates, requiring ongoing maintenance. This shift is consistent with TIBCO’s efforts to transition customers to subscription-based licensing, which might significantly increase prices.
Other concerns include the auditing of existing customers. This is part of their revenue-boosting strategy since TIBCO was acquired by Vista, which was not well received by some of their clients.
3. Limited API Management
The main purpose of TIBCO acquiring Mashery was to improve its API management (APIM) capabilities. However, Mashery was not able to meet comprehensive API management, security, and monitoring requirements. This resulted in multiple users migrating to alternative APIM solutions.
Furthermore, unlike MuleSoft, TIBCO APIM does not hold a leading position in assessments by Gartner or Forrester. While TIBCO provides plenty of API administration tools, it lacks MuleSoft’s deeply embedded API-centric strategy.
4. Key Architectural Changes
Most TIBCO clients follow a central P2P architecture. Such architecture consolidates all integrations and APIs within a single TIBCO runtime. Recently, TIBCO has been encouraging customers to adopt a new architectural paradigm that embraces containerization, microservices, and APi-led design. In practice, for users, this would mean frequent restarts from scratch. This is mainly due to the complex process of transitioning to an API-led microservice architecture.
TIBCO’s migration to the latest versions becomes less critical for customers who are satisfied with their existing central hub architecture. However, there are modern practices that might overcomplicate the migration process. These include adopting the new architecture, cloud deployment, and subscription-based licensing.
5. Uncertain Strategic and Partner Direction
When Vista Equity Partners purchased TIBCO and merged it with Citrix Systems, they effectively formed the Cloud Software Group. TIBCO has undergone several leadership changes and acquisitions but still needs a clear strategic direction.
MuleSoft is a worldwide integration leader. It supports open standards, design-first methodology, and building cloud-native applications. With APIs emerging as the crucial building blocks for enterprise integration, MuleSoft’s popularity has been consistently at the top in catering to customers from different industries.
The MuleSoft platform boasts over 200 pre-built connectors to connect applications and systems of any kind, anywhere. Its XML SDK and Java SDK for custom connector creation are also key benefits. MuleSoft API Manager features multiple out-of-the-box policies. These include rate limiting, spike control, and security policies, as well as custom policies. The platform API and CLI significantly simplify MuleSoft integration with CI/CD pipelines and source control systems.
MuleSoft offers a wide range of core components for implementing Enterprise Integration Patterns. Its deployment options include CloudHub, CloudHub 2.0, Customer Hosted (On-premise), Hybrid, and Runtime Fabric Manager (based on Kubernetes).
The platform allows API design and development with little or no code. It also supports various architectural styles, including microservices, domain-driven design, and API-led connectivity.
The MuleSoft’s Anypoint Monitoring service monitors APIs and retrieves real-time metrics and insights.
To migrate to MuleSoft successfully, you will need a clearly defined migration strategy. You should evaluate the current environment, identify risks, and carefully select tools and resources.
Below, you can find three different approaches that allow businesses to manage the transition effectively.
Using MuleSoft for new projects while maintaining existing TIBCO integrations is not uncommon. The gradual migration to MuleSoft ensures a smooth transition without affecting ongoing operations.
Phased migration entails transitioning specific business units or areas from TIBCO to MuleSoft. This is based on business lines or prerogatives. With the phased approach, crucial requirements are addressed with the highest priority.
This includes an entire migration of all existing integrations, systems, and processes to MuleSoft. The single coordinated effort is less straightforward and takes more time. However, it means a fresh start for the integration landscape.
After measuring the pros and cons of the strategies, it all comes down to the company’s goals, capacity, and limitations. While TIBCO remains a solid name in the integration space with a long history and substantial achievements, MuleSoft outperforms it in many ways.
Businesses that look for a modern, agile, and robust integration platform would typically choose MuleSoft over TIBCO. MuleSoft’s regular updates and affinity to new technologies future-proof its services. Furthermore, MuleSoft’s Anypoint Platform is user-friendly and easy to set up. It is also more efficient for advanced data integrations when compared to TIBCO.
Our MuleSoft team has an impressive track record of numerous MuleSoft integrations. Scalefocus’ expertise in all major industry verticals has enabled our partners to overcome their integration challenges and accelerate time-to-market, enhance business processes, and reduce cost. You can read more in our case study on MuleSoft API-Led Connectivity.
Contact us now and let’s discuss how we can assist you with your projects!